• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My point was they’d still have some need to launder money. Or do you think it was just a walk in the park to get tons of gold and avoid all the people you’ve just robbed?

    Even if laundering money was just as easy for some as going to the right port and melting it down DOES NOT erase the long history of laundering and subterfuge.

    A single time period with single instances where pirates were the police does not magically remove the MUCH larger history of civilization.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      They had their own islands and cities which they could defend.

      Yes, they absolutely could avoid anyone they just robbed. That’s why they did it.

      Honestly you still haven’t even glimpsed at the articles yet, have you?

      “much larger history of civilization”

      Pirates are still a thing. Less so, but they are.

      It was just the golden age of piracy because of just how far spread it was and how little any state could oppose them. Lots of states allowed and supported it, as per common knowledge and me now reiterating it for the second time.

      Tldr, my point is that you’re wrong.