• UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not enough sales data from Nintendo’s little experiment yet. Don’t hold your breath, ‘this stage’ won’t last.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t understand looking at Sims 4 as an example. The game has had progressive additions for a long time; it’s basically a live service game, and now comes free.

        It’s rare for anyone to feel they want all the DLC - usually it would just be a few things they want and have fun with.

        • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I actually do want all the DLC in a game like that. The fact it’s prohibitively expensive just means I’ve never actually bought any and stick to the Sims 3, a game where I do have all the expansions.

        • absquatulate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          True, but iirc sims 4 also released in a more cut-down state than sims 3 - in fact it was one of the pioneers of “paradoxification” of games and victim of other bullshit that EA was trying to pull, just like with simcity.

          Anyway, my point was that with EA the up-front price they charge is not awfully relevant, because you have lootboxes, p2w, mtx, gambling, dlc of varying dollar value etc. so you might end up paying a crapload, live service or not.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      The base price increase would still raise the total with DLC. Not including the DLC is still worth talking about, since there are plenty of ways to enjoy a game without it.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ya like being a patient gamer haha.

        I have such a backlog of stuff I wanna play that I just wishlist it and when the price feels right down the line I’ll buy it for the backlog.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      well DLC has always cost money on top of the base game so i’m not sure what your point is.

      edit:

      you’re ignoring that if you buy all DLCs you get much more content compared to old $60 games. If you want to look at this fairly you need to come up with some way of quantifying the content involved which is not easy to do.

      I do agree that some DLCs are clearly designed as money grabs (like most premium/gold launch editions). But i disagree with lumping all DLC into that category, especially bigger expansions that release a year or more later.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That the game is broken up into parts to charge more instead of, you know, making the game feature-rich in the first place.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          do you not agree most games ARE feature rich in the first place? I mean compared to old $60 games.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            The ones by big publishers? No, they’re feature complete at best for the sake of the game loop but sell the rest in overpriced DLCs. The base game is the hook, that’s why Epic keeps giving some away for free or are sold at a heavy discount on Steam. You only need to scroll down to notice.

            • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              agree to disagree i guess. i don’t find base games to be any less feature complete than they ever were. they fact that DLCs are sold on top of the base game does not change that.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          which is a disingenuous way of framing the issue. if you’re including DLC you’re also getting much more content than old $60 games.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    Love how fast they all dial back after seeing the reaction on nintendo’s 80$ approach. But seriously EA I don’t care for those extra 10 bucks upfronf if your games are still the mtx and gambling infested shit they currently are.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    No $80, theyre going to stick with $70.

    Fools stupid people into thinking theyre being generous. Same tactic gas companies keep doing in California to raise gas prices. Price goes up almost $2 per gallon, and then back down only $1.

    At least with video games we don’t have to buy them to live.

  • UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Fuck EA. If they dont offer appropriate support, I will never buy any games from them again.

    Multimillion Dollar company but 0,0% real, human support. If you can’t log into your account, you’re fucked. Your account is gone.