• FairycorePhoebe@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I don’t understand how this is a controversial opinion, but maybe parents should actually parent their children instead of expecting the Internet or the government to decide what their kids should see for them? Maybe talk to your kid about safe and ethical sex, the dangers of porn addiction, and not to take anything away from pornographic content instead? Maybe we shouldn’t be giving children smartphones and tablets with unfettered internet access in the first place instead of spending time with them? Wild concepts I know.

    • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      because these laws aren’t about protecting children they’re about elimination of access to things the government doesn’t like… like queer spaces

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Don’t give your children unrestricted acces to a smartphone until they’ve proven they can use it wisely. No smartphone before age twelve. Limited use until age 15. And ffs. Ban smartphones at school.

      Teach your kids about the internet. It’s part of sexual education.

      And don’t leave it up to private companies to identify me and collect sensitive data on me. Fuck that. If you really want age verification. Deliver the framework.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      My 5 year old son does have access to an android tablet, but i restrict, selectively, what he can do on it and time limit his usage so it locks down after a few hours. I curate his youtube and frequently spend time watching kids content to decide if i want him watching it. If its good and educational i will share it to his kids youtube account. He cant browse the web, he cant buy things on the play stores. He has to get me to approve any app install and i will always install first and play to ensure it safe.

      Its hard work, but its worth it to protect him online. And this has lead to it just being another one of his toys, it doesnt absorb his whole existence. He can take it or leave it. Which i am chuffed about.

      When he is older and i can help him understand for himself how to be safe, i will help him however i can. Rather than restric, i will help him understand what the internet is, the good the bad and the ugly.

      • monogram@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Good to hear a parent parenting ⭐

        I wonder how you’ll deal with a 16yo things get tricky with hormones, sex and rebellion.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I expect i will crumple at that point. But i hope i set him up with the tools he needs to navigate that part of life. And hopefully he feels close enough with me to come to me for help.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’ve been saying this a couple places recently, but why not pass legislation requiring every site to provide a content rating. Then parents can choose if they want to restrict content by ratings or not. Yeah, you could have malicious actors, but it makes it easier and simpler for everyone to work than having ID laws.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        But that would actually solve the problem and not enable massive government overreach. We can’t have that.