• tequinhu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    In maths “trivial” is usually when the author has a statement they could prove, but chose not to (either because is too obvious, stems from a result in another text, or is a lenghty proof)

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      In physics and other sciences “trivial” also refers to solutions that are technically correct but uninteresting (like x=0 for many equations) or cases where the result is so straightforwad that it doesn’t need explanation to experts in the feild.

      • niktemadur@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        In physics, two terms that I often seem to notice together are “trivial” and “local”. Local is easy to define clearly: within the speed of light/causality. Trivial seems like a vaguer term.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Then it sounds like the term “trivial” is subjective, which feels kinda icky in math. Worse, it sounds as if the “dear reader” is supposed to figure out what the author or lecturer means by “trivial” in each case; sure, there is context involved, but still… icky.

      • tequinhu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Indeed it is, back in the university there was a kind of meme among students

        Whenever you had any bullshit argument you pulled out of your ass you could say: “this is trivial and the proof is left to the reader”

        On a more serious note, it was one of the main points of attriction betwee professors and students