• betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    Y.T.’s mom decides to spend between fourteen and fifteen minutes reading the memo. It’s better for younger workers to spend too long, to show that they’re careful, not cocky. It’s better for older workers to go a little fast, to show good management potential. She’s pushing forty. She scans through the memo, hitting the Page Down button at reasonably regular intervals, occasionally paging back up to pretend to reread some earlier section. The computer is going to notice all this. It approves of rereading. It’s a small thing, but over a decade or so this stuff really shows up on your work-habits summary.

    Snow Crash

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Incredible book. Takes a chapter or two to get used to the writing style (2d person present tense if I recall).

      Correction: 3rd person. Somehow the present tense throws a different reading rhythm that you have to get into first.

      • hobovision@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wouldn’t 2nd person be more like

        “you decide to read the memo slowly…”

        The snippet above read like 3rd person present tense to me, which is still definitely unusual.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, 2nd person is pretty rare. the “Broken Earth” books by NK Jemisen are 2nd person, if i recall.

          • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Interesting, only instances I can think of for 2nd person writing are those old “choose your own adventure” books.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hundreds of billions of dollars can’t be wrong!

      No, seriously. They can’t. be. wrong.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can attest. I’m told all day long every day to use AI use AI use AI. It’s going to transform us / we must use it to survive / we won’t be left behind / these tools are changing the world / if we don’t use AI others will and they will eat our lunch. It’s so intense that performative AI use has begun: “look everyone I did an AI!!”

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just like how when flight was invented people couldn’t figure how to utilize it for a long time.

      Or how when the cell phone or iphone came around no one could even find a good use case for a few decades.

      Oh, people had thousands of uses for them lined up before the tech was even there? Hm. Surely we can brainstorm and force our way out of AI being a waste of money

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        AI exists to steal what people made and sell it back to people without the skill to use. Not to bring about a moral panic, but people aren’t learning how to do those things because “AI can do it” and with that, we end up with people not learning how to do it.

        I’m trying to learn to code in python. I’m certainly not a coder by trade, but when I actually write code, I learn more than I do if I read what ChatGPT spits out.

        Now if you excuse me, after ages of playing around with Turtle, amma try figure out how to get Python to work with json files so I can use it to make a train departures board for my local station.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    My workplace is also requiring AI usage to show in goals and evaluation reports.

    I don’t know if this fabricated push is just window dressing for stakeholders, but that kind of surprised me, because we’re not exactly backed by VC or even in this “big tech” arms race.

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Every executive team hates one thing : paying labor. The entire AI sales pitch is “if you pay us, you can stop paying people.”

      Even if it’s not possible, they all want the same management dream, no matter the industry, so they will all push towards it.

    • TheTurner@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Me too eventually. They’re building an AI bot and I had to send in questions that I would Google. Why tf am I using a not to search for what I need when I can find it faster? Lol

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, no, if you create something, there could be legal/copyright issues. Just have AI do it, so we can steal from other people legally…

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You must be this incompetent to be promoted in this shithole company:

    ——

    |

    |

    |

    |

    |