RetroWaifu Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 days ago

BREAKING: Pam Bondi Reportedly Asking Grand Jury to Consider Indictments in Obama-Clinton ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Case

www.mediaite.com

external-link
message-square
32
link
fedilink
91
external-link

BREAKING: Pam Bondi Reportedly Asking Grand Jury to Consider Indictments in Obama-Clinton ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Case

www.mediaite.com

Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 days ago
message-square
32
link
fedilink
Pam Bondi Reportedly Asking Grand Jury to Consider Indictments in Obama-Clinton ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Case
www.mediaite.com
external-link
Pam Bondi has directed a DOJ prosecutor to bring evidence before a grand jury to consider criminal indictments pertaining to the Trump-Russia investigation.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just release the Epstein files, Pam.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep, total distraction. Why didn’t they do this during his first term if this was a thing.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        It took them a while to fabricate the “evidence.”

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have no hope that we will ever see those files. I do hope however, that this takes on a bit of meme status a la Hell in a cell/undertaker throwing mankind off a cage. Years from now seemingly innocuous sentences will suddenly diverge into a common refrain about the files not being released.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oohhhh no!! Not Obama!! Or Clinton!!! 🤣

    What these morons don’t understand is that liberals don’t worship these rich cunts. If either of them did something illegal I don’t give a shit if the law goes after them.

    The sad thing is that, even IF they did something they are rich and nothing will happen.

    If something did happen though, wouldn’t that be a nice precedent to go after politicans / presidents?

    Be careful what you wish for, you orange turd.

  • RedPostItNote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    He’s grasping at straws doing anything he can to get attention away from me Trumpstein files.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    I thought if the President does it, it wasn’t illegal?

    Wasn’t that the entire argument since 2017?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ah, but they didn’t specify which President was “the President”.

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        President ®

        president (D)

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Classic mistake. It isn"t illegal if the president does it and they are white/orange

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s the Republican motto:

      “Fuck kids. Yes, literally.”

      Sorry, not that one.

      “Rules for thee, but none for me.”

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Trump is a pedo rapist. Release the files.

  • Trapped In America@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Do the DOJ even have a red-yarn budget?

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Aren’t presidents immune from any charges/investigations thanks to POTUS47?

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      it’s SCOTUS, and only if they approve of that particular bit of lawlessness.

      There is no rule of law with the Roberts “court.” It’s all arbitrary and rigged.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hey everyone look at this!!

    Don’t talk about Epstein.

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Shiny! Ooo. But yeah, what about Epstein?

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    From the admin that tried to hang Mike Pence, then did pardon those directly responsible.

    Also. Release the Epstein Files.

  • Wazowski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    How many kids did trump rape?

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe the sub rules say you need to use the exact title, but I feel like the ‘breaking’ part met be omitted.

  • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Where’s the files Donald?

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    These Epstein distractions don’t even make sense. Guess they never did, but still.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2K users / day
  • 5.68K users / week
  • 7.22K users / month
  • 7.25K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 25.2K subscribers
  • 565 Posts
  • 7.48K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org