• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • Sure. Let them whatabout. But to us, consumers, it shouldn’t matter.

    We know the stores aren’t responsible, so we shouldn’t attack them.

    The processors are. For Visa and MasterCard it’s pretty obvious. Itch, as you said, puts direct blame on Stripe, and I think we can trust that.

    As much as processors need banks, banks also need processors. It’s a sort of symbiosis. Damage to one actually trickles onto the other. So pressing onto processors isn’t a mistake. It’d be foolish at best and malicious at worst to suggest that.

    Now that we have leverage as users and consumers, having started a push which made way and caused a response (first the prepared phone statement and now a press release), the absolute wrong thing to do is bacl down and say “sorry, we were wrong, it was B after all and not you, A”.

    And look at it this way: There’s less payment processors and they’re smaller than banks. If you suddenly turn to banks, you won’t accomplish anything because to them, a few consumers who aren’t their customers doesn’t cause them even an itch. But if payment processors come to them it might.


  • It never was about the laws. If it were, Mastercard wouldn’t have been doing it for quite some time now.

    It’s truly idiotic. They backed down to 200 phone calls from CS. They probably cited that rule, saying doing what they do (processing payments) will damage their brand.

    Lo and behold, once they stopped processing transactions their brand got damaged. And due to the ego damage already associated, they won’t back down and backtrack not that they actually have a problem on their hands. What with their brand being seen as discriminatory, weak to undue influence and excersizing undue power against their own clients. Very “good brand” of you, Mastercard.

    If Mastercard wants to display Christo-fascist family friendlyness they can slap a cross onto their logo and change the font to Comic sans.




  • In my opinion, AI just feels like the logical next step for capitalist exploitation and destruction of culture.

    I don’t think AI is inherently bad. What’s bad is how we (or well, the corpos) use it. SEO, vibe coding, making slop, you name it.

    About training material being stealing: hard agree here. Our copyright laws are broken, but they are right about AI - training is strong in a retrieval system, which is infingement. Shame they aren’t enforced at all.

    What fascinates me is the similarity between AI and photography. That is, both are revolutionary tools in the visual medium. Imagine this thread being an opinion column in an 1800s newspaper, and replace all instances of ‘AI’ with ‘photography’. The arguments all stand, but our perspective to them may change.






  • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldApple
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Apple devices mostly aren‘t significantly more expensive than their counterparts by other manufacturers.

    However, most of those offer cheaper alternatives that Apple doesn’t.

    So, there are no Apple counterparts for what “other manufacturers” make.