Human
Hopefully they will stop using ai for that. I did one interview like that. It was really bad. The questions were stupid (I don’t understand why they didn’t at least prepare their own questions), it was interrupting me, progressing when it shouldn’t,…
After that I refused to do another interview like that and maybe up to 20% were like that.
Possibly yes. Would be a fun project.
They video you to check if the interview is legit.
And there go the insults and attacks. Just what I was talking about in the beginning: anti ai people are way more extremist, way more obnoxious. You don’t even know where I stand, for you it’s enough to know I’m not 110% on your side and that’s enough to attack.
More attacks, more insults.
You are adamant to continue proving my point.
No idea what you are talking about. The largest majority cals LLMs artificial intelligence. Because lnguistically, LLM is simply a subtyp of AI.
In public discourse and marketing, “AI” has become a blanket term for anything that learns and writes like a human, and LLMs fit the bill. So as a linguistic shortcut, when LLMs got popular, people replaced that specific kind of AI with just “AI. By definition, an LLM is a kind of AI, a specialized system trained on massive text to generate language, making it a clear hyponym of AI. That relationship justifies calling LLMs simply AI.
There is also because of generic reference: It’s easier to say “I used AI” than to specify “I prompted a 175B‑parameter transformer model.”
I sorry dude, but these are jusy linguistic mechanism at play. You can shout and complain so you want, it’s AI. It’s AI. Get over it, find a different hill to die on.
See! Immediate attack on me. You don’t know anything about be and what I believe.
It was not a logical fallacy to begin with and I only had one comment and it was only to the guy who was attacked, not to anyone else.
What do you care so much where I talk about how obnoxious fuck_ai has become? It’s a stupid cult, that doesn’t want any dissenting opinions and people are attacked for not being extreme enough. A sewer.
Me too. Especially here in Lemmy. Definitely way more people rage about it. Rarely I see people being obnoxious by promoting it.
Environmental responsibility? That’s the only real argument they have and even that is on shaky ground.
I beg to differ. Anti ai is way bigger on Lemmy than pro. You can see this even by the likes.
Second part is about semantics of ai. We use the term AI because that kind of stuck. Everybody uses the term. It makes no sense to every time rage about what it means specifically, especially since most people do fairly understand what it is.
Yesterday I saw a guy attacked on fuck_ai because he wasn’t extreme enough with his anti ai attitude.
I commented to him, only said I thought that his comment was valid and got promptly deleted.
That makes sense. People are starting to use it more, but for less elaborate things where they still have control.
😀 yes. I don’t think the install is an issue. The usage, my comment was aimed at the usage. Sorry I wasn’t more explicit.
I have installed Linux before, I even have a Linux that I use for a Plex server. But that’s nothing compared to using it as a daily driver.
I threw my 20s away on drugs, parties and undiagnosed anxiety disorder. A part of my 30s too. I got my life together at the end of them finally.
Wow! So this is what happens when you install Linux and graphene? I want to do this too. But I have other hobbies and a family. Does it make sense for someone like me?
I guess they record head movement, eyes and mouth. The instruction was too look at the screen or camera and not look away too much, so I guess they can spot that.