They will to avoid the tarriffs that are 5x.

Personally i believe the tarrifs should have been a percentage target with increasing penalties when not met. But going full bire works too just is a more painful transition.

Put on a dress and do your nails they’ll love you.

50/c/tour using highly cacheable data is easily profitable. but profitability is a completely unrelated point. as you touched on briefly.

Which takes me back to: ‘this is just all kinds of fucked up’

we’re not missing anything. renters don’t pay for tours of units. that’s the landlords problem. this is just all kinds of fucked up.

because you and these protests are quoting 3.5% as if its a fact. its a magnitude without a vector. the vector is the important aspect, not the magnitude. if your vector is ‘run around city limits with pithy signage’ (our current protests) I assure you, nothing will change even if you had 50% of the population doing it.

historically its when the vector hits around 3.5% that matters. if you have the wrong vector the magnitude is completely unrelated and you’ll end up in a different location than you expected. Notice that around aspect of 3.5% because guess what: it actually isnt a value that matters much. its the vector that actually institutes change.

the population against the GOP and Trump already exceeds 3.5% they just dont know how to effectively protest and the people running these protests have nfc what they are doing when it comes to leading such activities. that was the point of the voting numbers.

my point is quoting that number as if its a magical threshold we need to reach without anything else is actually counter productive to actually getting change.

the problem with you being an idiot and spouting this nonsense is hilariously exemplified by your assertion that reading papers and books somehow gives you insights without actually putting that information into its proper context which you clearly havent, nor have the people running these protests.

if you want these protests to be effective you need to do a few things:

• actually cause harm to the institutes causing the problems.
• do it in such a way the population doesnt revolt against you efforts.
• show that its effective and people should help. (you’ll know because the government will crack down on you, and people will show up to future events)

anything outside of those 3 aspects in just noise. I’ll simply point you to luigi as a wonderful counter point to the ‘nonviolence’ aspect of that 3.5% number tossed around. His actions where highly supported by the population, used violence effectively, and it did effect change however small. if you look at basically every successful movement there is always violence involved. which people like the author try to ignore. take gandhi’s movement against the british, widely lauded as non-violent, however if you take a wider perspective beyond that movement itself you’ll learn there was violence involved. by other groups at the same time you can’t decouple those two groups from the outcome. they both play roles in the result and thats exactly what the paper where the 3.5% number comes from ignored; the activities of the groups operating at the same time as the peaceful ones.

And then there is the question of what actually constitutes violence. did they consider property damage as violence? how about economic blockades? I consider both to be violence and effective agents of change.

it always astounds me how utterly arrogant people are about their own abilities. (myself included) but seriously who the fuck doesnt like having something that just prevents you from doing things that are obviously broken and not going to work?

Sources for over 3.5%: see the 2023 election results. 60 million people were willing to vote for a genocidal prick over trump.

Sources for ineffective protests: please attend any no kings protest and you’ll see what i mean. Words words words, and not a single action being promoted.

Sources for violence: pick a movement. Will find the violent aspects. But lets use gandhi as an initial example

If you think just having 3.5% of the populations support is sufficient you’re an idiot. You need that support to be willing to do something that negatively impacts society, strikes, sit ins, property damage, etc.

You’ll note the distinct lack of actual activity against trump. People are more interested in waving signs and listening to people talk than actuall doing anything.

Then you twats run around screeching 3.5% is all we need! God you’re all idiots. At least start fucking striking. Someones notices a numerical value and you twits think the number is magical all on its own completely disassociating it from actual context.

I’m well aware of it. sorry but basically every instance of a government falling from power have substantial violent elements operating simultaneously with the non-violent. just quoting ‘if we 3.5% of the population’ gets you no where. we already have 3.5% of the population against trump/gop. the problem is you twits dont know how to protest effectively.

people need to stop quoting that 3% nonsense. its not 3% of the population chanting and waving signs that trigger change. its violence, either economic, property or physical. you’re not going to accomplish anything until you start breaking shit. and from i’ve seen people in the US are no where near the state of being willing to do that.

Yes. UDP relies on the IP protocols just as TCP does.

as I said stop wasting peoples time. troll elsewhere.

Lol. Dont waste peoples time in the future thanks!

TCP/IP isnt the only standard in use even today. UDP/IP is the other big one and there’s a few smaller protocols hanging around like utp.

as i said you’re not willing to consider them as clearly demonstrated by trying to push the responsibility for these issues onto others.

there are paths you’re just not willing to consider them.

Let me introduce you to the conflict. Hamas’ behavior is a natural reaction to what israel has been doing for decades and will continue to happen. Both groups are insane fundamentalists. The only difference between them is one has the backing of the superpower and its media apparatus.

Fun fact watch videos on Israel’s civi takes about Palestine. May open your eyes a bit about the innocence thats available in that geographic region for anyone.

No, its not.