• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not the news I was expecting but kind of a cool way to address a variety of issues, like obesity, imports from US, generating revenue, subsidizing a national crop, etc.

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    American government: Builds concentration camps

    Mexican government: Develops brand new chocolate bars

    I’m happy to see there are still some governments out there who rule in the interest of the people.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      The MEXICAN government ruling in the interests of the people? This is absolutely delusional. Mexico is one of the most corrupt, dangerous, and unstable places in the world. The country is quickly turning into a warzone because of the cartels, and both the current and previous presidents and their government aren’t doing anything about it because they’re bought.

      A government making a chocolate bar to distract from the crippling poverty and crime is not good governance, it’s the opposite.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Mexico’s murder rate per 100 000 is 24.9, meaning you’re on average safer in Mexico than in Newark, Memphis, Cleveland, Kansas City, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Detroit, Baltimore or St. Louis.

        Never mind that murders in Mexico are generally committed using American firearms, and for American money over drugs that are to be sold in America. Mexico’s problem is America. So while we wait for America to selfdestruct, I guess they might as well get to work on public health issues.

        Obviously not saying that cartels are not a huge fucking problem. It’s hard to get good politicians when they murder anyone who resists them. But the cartels are in large part a product of America’s failures. Europeans are not innocent either - fuck every coke snorting upper class brat who is having their pathetic highs at the expense of a whole fucking continent.

        /rant

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Hershey chocolate bar is rejected as chocolate because it doesn’t have enough cocoa and is contaminated with lead.

    Hershey’s milk chocolate contains around 11% cocoa solids, meaning it doesn’t meet the European standard according to some sources. Therefore, in some European countries, Hershey’s is labeled as “chocolate-flavored” or “chocolate-flavored candy bar” rather than simply “chocolate”.

    https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/consumer-reports-finds-more-lead-cadmium-chocolate-urges-change-hershey-2023-10-25/

  • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    50% is a little low for my taste. I wish it was more like 40 60 80. I’d be going for the 80. Or maybe just 50 & 70. I can live with 70.

    • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      I would presume it’s because they’re low in sugar. Due to exploding diabetes rates, Mexico has been making a concerted effort in the last few years to stem the consumption of sugary foods, drinks and snacks, particularly amongst kids. You can’t have a cartoon mascot on a box of cereal, for example. They put big stickers over Tony the Tiger before changing the packaging completely. And the cost of snack foods has skyrocketed, making it largely unaffordable for lots of Mexican families. A bag of chips there costs more than it does in North America.

      My guess is that this is part of that effort.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Man, I hope so.

          When I worked in one of the poorest places in the US, those people literally couldn’t afford to get quality food.

          They had no refrigeration so they’d walk to the dollar general and get microwave tv dinners super cheap and heat them up at my store.

          You take that cheap shit away and don’t provide alternatives and those people literally starve.

          I’ve heard people say, “those people just need to get a job.” When I was in my 20s I tried very hard to employ them. (My uncle owned a chain of gas stations and, despite his issues, he cares about people and tries to help where he can in his way).

          One story that stands out in my mind. Dude shows up with the application, gives a great interview. Apparently social services were going to cut him off if he didn’t get a job. He worked for less than a week, then drank a half a gallon chocolate milk to cause issues with his diabetes so he could leave without confrontation via ambulance.

          When I got his paperwork, he could not read or write and was scribbling random gibberish. There’s no telling how much just went out the door because he didn’t know how to handle it.

          I was so angry at the person who trained him because she didn’t say anything about this. She just coldly said, “he’s an idiot. He isn’t going to last.”

          The world shits on people like him. He was denied his disability over and over again.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    For reference, this is the legal definition in France (which still allows for some shitty chocolate BTW) :

    Chocolat :

    a) Désigne le produit obtenu à partir de produits de cacao et de sucres contenant, sous réserve du point b, pas moins de 35 % de matière sèche totale de cacao, dont pas moins de 18 % de beurre de cacao et pas moins de 14 % de cacao sec dégraissé.

    Rough translation:
    Chocolate is the product obtained from cocoa and sugars which shall contain no less (although see point b) than 35% of dry cocoa solids including 18% cocoa butter and 14% dry degreased cocoa.

    Point b covers specialty chocolates, such as guanduja, etc.

    Full text here(fr)

    Edit: better formatting

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I always wondered what darker chocolate would be like when first ingredient on the list isn’t sugar… Powered milk is sweet by itself, but without all the sugar I think 50% cocoa content might be more powerful than in 50% chocolate we have here in Europe.

    • Nefara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Do you really not have dark chocolate bars where you are? It’s pretty easy where I’m at to get 70% chocolate bars, and even 80% and 90%. You might have to go to a specialty shop for them but they’re just in the grocery store where I’m at.

      It’s delicious, complex and depending on the origin or blend it can be fruity, dark, earthy, bitter, slightly spicy or taste like coffee. Proper dark chocolate has a kick of caffeine in it too. Hope you get a chance to try it!

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        We do all the way to 95% I believe was the highest. But they all contain tons of sugar regardless. Lessy obviously with that much cocoa, but still. The ingredients for this one didn’t mention any sugar…

    • randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Now I don’t really know that much about their system, but I would assume that almost every sweet would get at least one seal unless it’s made very healthy and not a sweet anymore? I don’t really speak Spanish, but in the link you sent there is an illustration of a girl smiling and holding a bag of cookies with two seals and with sparkles on the bag. Maybe the point is to choose the ones with fewer seals, and not to try to go for none?

      • oni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        You are right! The less seals the better, and we do activily look for products that have less than 3 seals. This being a “healthy product” with 3 seals is a red flag, because there are non healty products that do have 3 seals too. May be 2 seals can be more acceptable, but 3?? Non-sugar Coca-Cola has 0 seals, it only has labels, which says that the product have caffeine and endulcorants.

        Edit: I post the Coca-Cola example to make you see the irony, because is real.

    • syreus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is a really neat system for making your uneducated populace healthier. People can’t be bothered to read so a single number to indicate something is unhealthy is rad.

  • huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Don’t get me wrong, I don’t Mexico to sell mind Mexico selling chocolate but why are they thinking this is part of their job as government??

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t Mexico to sell chocolate

      Well I do Mexico to sell chocolate.

      Comedy aside, I think its to address the extraordinary obesity issues that Mexico has faced in the past 20 years. Mexico is in my top 2 of countries I’m moving to as the US collapses, but they have real issues with refined foods and especially added sugar.

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        What’s your other top 2 country? If I go I think I’m going to switch continents. I would prefer there to be a whole ocean between me and this bullshit.