The show was losing around $40m a year, and its audience was down over 30% over 5 years. In recent years late-night’s profits have “shrunk toward non-existent” [Bill Carter, author of The War for Late Night].
It used to be that they were a cheap but profitable way to keep viewers watching the local news. As news access has shifted online and real-time, the business case for late night has become more shaky. Even the brief respite of a decade ago with vitalised YouTube clips has gone, with Google reducing the amount paid for views far below the rates for broadcast. Guests, too, now prefer the more relaxed and convenient podcast appearance.
So NBC has cut output from 5 nights to 4, and got rid of Seth Meyers’ house band. CBS scrapped the post-Colbert slot entirely earlier this season. There may be strong political conveniences at play, but the business case is also valid.
The only thing that was suspicious was the timing.
I fully believe that it was a massive money loser. Colbert’s wages alone were high. He apparently started at $6m per year and then got a new contract at $15m per year.
That might seem high, but at his peak Johnny Carson was making $25m per year. That was in 1991. So, $25m per year would be worth $55m today. But, that was in a 3-channel world where there weren’t many options.
And these late night shows cost about $1.7 million per week to make, or about $75m per year.
So, it makes a lot of sense that it would be losing a lot of money. It also makes sense that they would be thinking about cancelling it.
But, it was also the #1 late night talk show. And that has been a really prestigious thing for the networks for decades. I think even if it was a money loser, I think CBS would likely have wanted to hold on to the #1 late night show for a long time, just for bragging rights. Being #1 in late night is also useful for cross-promotion. Colbert always interviews the stars of major CBS shows: Tracker, Ghosts, Matlock, NCIS, etc. And being the #1 show means it’s the first place that Hollywood stars stop to promote their movies, etc.
I think it’s more likely they would have tried some cost cutting, and they would have tried to outlast the other late night shows rather than being the first network to give up on late night talk shows.
The cancellation of Late Night isn’t suspicious. But the timing of the cancellation of Late Night is very suspicious.
I think even if it was a money loser, I think CBS would likely have wanted to hold on to the #1 late night show for a long time, just for bragging rights. Being #1 in late night is also useful for cross-promotion. Colbert always interviews the stars of major CBS shows: Tracker, Ghosts, Matlock, NCIS, etc. And being the #1 show means it’s the first place that Hollywood stars stop to promote their movies, etc.
Sounds like you don’t have an MBA and don’t like to ruin everything like they do because of it!
The numbers people can’t even comprehend what you said sometimes.
Give it a few years and they’ll be baffled by reductions everywhere else.
I am a huge fan of his show and watch every night, but I agree, the format is pretty dated. Even the idea of a house band barely makes any sense. I miss ‘The Soup’ and Joel McHale.
It’s almost as though the stated reason for canceling the show (losing money) is bullshit.
The show was losing around $40m a year, and its audience was down over 30% over 5 years. In recent years late-night’s profits have “shrunk toward non-existent” [Bill Carter, author of The War for Late Night].
It used to be that they were a cheap but profitable way to keep viewers watching the local news. As news access has shifted online and real-time, the business case for late night has become more shaky. Even the brief respite of a decade ago with vitalised YouTube clips has gone, with Google reducing the amount paid for views far below the rates for broadcast. Guests, too, now prefer the more relaxed and convenient podcast appearance.
So NBC has cut output from 5 nights to 4, and got rid of Seth Meyers’ house band. CBS scrapped the post-Colbert slot entirely earlier this season. There may be strong political conveniences at play, but the business case is also valid.
The only thing that was suspicious was the timing.
I fully believe that it was a massive money loser. Colbert’s wages alone were high. He apparently started at $6m per year and then got a new contract at $15m per year.
That might seem high, but at his peak Johnny Carson was making $25m per year. That was in 1991. So, $25m per year would be worth $55m today. But, that was in a 3-channel world where there weren’t many options.
“Carson at his peak averaged 9 million viewers nightly; Stephen Colbert now leads a crowded field with about 3 million.”
And these late night shows cost about $1.7 million per week to make, or about $75m per year.
So, it makes a lot of sense that it would be losing a lot of money. It also makes sense that they would be thinking about cancelling it.
But, it was also the #1 late night talk show. And that has been a really prestigious thing for the networks for decades. I think even if it was a money loser, I think CBS would likely have wanted to hold on to the #1 late night show for a long time, just for bragging rights. Being #1 in late night is also useful for cross-promotion. Colbert always interviews the stars of major CBS shows: Tracker, Ghosts, Matlock, NCIS, etc. And being the #1 show means it’s the first place that Hollywood stars stop to promote their movies, etc.
I think it’s more likely they would have tried some cost cutting, and they would have tried to outlast the other late night shows rather than being the first network to give up on late night talk shows.
The cancellation of Late Night isn’t suspicious. But the timing of the cancellation of Late Night is very suspicious.
Sounds like you don’t have an MBA and don’t like to ruin everything like they do because of it!
The numbers people can’t even comprehend what you said sometimes.
Give it a few years and they’ll be baffled by reductions everywhere else.
“There may be strong political conveniences at play,”
Not may… there are and they exist.
“but the business case is also valid.”
No it isn’t. Those statistics intentionally include the Covid pandemic era numbers to skew the data.
Colbert lost 10% of its viewers in the first few months of 2024. It’s not covid.
Interesting background. Thanks for sharing.
Maybe CBS could get better value for on-demand streaming if they improved the shitty Paramount+ UI
I am a huge fan of his show and watch every night, but I agree, the format is pretty dated. Even the idea of a house band barely makes any sense. I miss ‘The Soup’ and Joel McHale.
The “financial reasons” was they got their merger approved by the corrupt administration.